WWW.BOOK.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, abstracts, thesis
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS

Pages:   || 2 |

«Combined Reporting Instructions Combined Reporting General Information 2011 FORM 355U and Accompanying Schedules For tax years beginning on or after ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Combined Reporting Instructions

Combined Reporting General Information

2011 FORM 355U and Accompanying Schedules

For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2009 Massachusetts requires certain corporations

engaged in a unitary business to calculate their income on a combined basis. A corporation is

subject to this requirement if it is subject to a tax on its income under Massachusetts General Law

(M.G.L). c. 63, § 2, 2B, 32D, 39 or 52A and it is engaged in a unitary business with one or more other corporations under common control, whether or not the other corporations are taxable in Massachusetts. The requirement to file on a combined basis is not dependent upon an evidentiary showing that there is a distortion of income between corporations that are related by common ownership or that there is a lack of arm’s length pricing in transactions between such corporations.

Common ownership for the purposes of M.G.L. c. 63, § 32B means that more than 50% of the voting control of each member of the group is directly or indirectly owned by a common owner or owners, either corporate or non-corporate, whether or not the owner or owners are members of the combined group. A unitary business exists for the purposes of § 32B when the activities of a group of two or more corporations under common ownership are sufficiently interdependent, integrated or interrelated through their activities so as to provide mutual benefit and produce a significant sharing or exchange of value among them or a significant flow of value between the separate parts. Massachusetts construes the term unitary business to broadest extent permitted under the United States Constitution.

A “combined group” is a group of corporations engaged in a unitary business and may, at the option of the group, include all non-U.S. corporations under a world-wide election that is binding for a ten year period. Alternately, taxpayers may elect to treat as their combined group all eligible members of their affiliated group without regard to whether or not the activities of each member are unitary; such an election is also binding for a ten year period. No group may make both a worldwide election and an affiliated group election for the same tax period and no group may make either election during the ten year period for which the other is in effect.

Corporations are excluded from the group if they are entities classified and taxed under M.G.L. c.

63, § 38B (Massachusetts Security Corporations, which pay a tax under M.G.L. c. 63 on gross income). A corporation is also excluded from a combined group if it is an entity described in G.L.

c. 63, §§ 20 to 29E, inclusive, except as provided in 830 CMR 63.32B.2 (4) (b) (certain insurance companies) or it is an entity described in M.G.L. c. 63, § 38Y (corporations exempt from taxation under section 501 of the Code with respect to most activities but subject to a tax on unrelated business come).

Members of the combined group, whether or not taxable in Massachusetts, combine their income from the unitary business. A “taxable member” is a corporation included in a combined group which is taxable on its income in Massachusetts; all other corporations which are part of such a group are “non-taxable members”. Each taxable member of such a combined group is apportioned a Massachusetts share of the group’s combined income calculated based on its own property, payroll and sales in this commonwealth and the total property payroll and sales of the entire group. If the taxable member has other income, either from non-business activities or from its participation in a second unitary business carried on by the group, all such amounts are added together to determine the taxable member’s income subject to tax. Each taxable member of the group then determines its separate income measure of excise and may take credits against this excise to the extent allowed by Massachusetts law.

The combined report required by M.G.L. c. 63, § 32B is filed on behalf of all members of the group by a principal reporting corporation, which must be a taxable member of the combined group and, if such a corporation exists and is a taxable member, the combined group’s common parent. If the combined group does not have a common parent or that corporation is not a taxable member of the group, the principal reporting corporation shall be the taxable member of the group that reasonably expects to have the largest amount of Massachusetts taxable net income on a recurring basis. In filing the return on behalf of the combined group, the principal reporting corporation agrees to act as the agent on behalf of the members of the combined group for all tax matters relating to the combined group, including: assessments; requesting extensions of time to file returns; making, renewing or revoking an election such as an affiliated group election or worldwide election; filing a refund claim; accepting of refunds or notices; executing waivers; and providing access to tax and other relevant records of the nontaxable members of the combined group as reasonably requested by the Commissioner. The designation of the principal reporting corporation, the elections allowed or required to be made by M.G.L. c. 63, the calculation of the group’s combined income, the determination of the apportioned shares of the taxable members, and the calculation of the income tax liabilities of the various members and the payments made by the group are reported on behalf of all members by the principal reporting corporation when filing Form 355U.





Form 355U, and all pertinent schedules, must be filed electronically. Submissions other than by electronic filing will not be considered a timely filed return. Detailed regulatory guidance with respect to the Massachusetts combined reporting law is set forth at 830 CMR 63.32B.2.

New for 2011 – Non-Income Measure Consolidation A major change for the current year is the addition of the non-income measure of excise to Form 355U. A business corporation will only file a separate form 355 or 355S to calculate its nonincome measure of excise if its separate federal taxable year ends at a different time than the common year used to determined combined group income (e.g. if the member is subject to fiscalization as described in 830 CMR 63.32B.2(12)(c). A Massachusetts S corporation that is included in a 355U will also continue to file form 355S but that return will be informational only and will include Schedules S and SK-1.

Structure of the Return & Relationship of Schedules Form 355U Form 355U shows the aggregate tax liability of the combined group. Massachusetts requires all corporations that are part of the combined group to use Department of Revenue (DOR) schedules to report their income as determined for federal income tax purposes and certain adjustments. This information must be provided separately for each member of the combined group on the specific DOR schedules described below. Each taxable member must also separately calculate its income measure of excise. For 2011 and subsequent years, most taxable members subject to a non-income measure of excise will also calculate that amount as part of the Form 355U filing and combine the totals. Taxable members also show the credits taken against its excise on the appropriate DOR schedules. The Form 355U will report the total tax liability shown on the schedules of the taxable members. The Form 355U will also declare whether the combined group is making or filing pursuant to either a worldwide or affiliated group election, and shall provide other general information on behalf of the combined group.

Schedules Required in All Returns Schedule U-M Each member of the combined group, whether taxable or not, reports its own income and expenses for federal income tax purposes together with certain adjustments. An additional Schedule U-M is also filed to show the Massachusetts intercompany eliminations, if any.

Schedule U-CI The amounts on all Schedules M are totaled to show the combined income of the group before certain Massachusetts adjustments.

Schedule U-E In Part 1 of this schedule, the combined income from a single unitary business is modified to reflect differences between Massachusetts and federal income calculations. Note that a group which is not making or subject to an affiliated group election may have more than one unitary business, in which case the group will divide the combined income shown on Schedule U-CI between the unitary businesses and file multiple Schedules U-E, one for each different unitary business.

In Part 2 of this schedule, the group calculates the denominators of the combined group’s property, payroll and sales factors for the purpose of apportioning this combined income to taxable members.

In Part 3 of this schedule, the group reports the combined Massachusetts numerators of all taxable members, totaling the amounts being reported separately by each taxable member on Schedule U-MSI.

In Part 4 of this schedule, the group reports the amount of the combined group’s taxable income or loss to be apportioned to all taxable members, totaling the amounts being reported separately by each taxable member on Schedule U-MSI.

Schedule U-NI The amounts on all Schedules U-E are totaled.

Schedule U-MSI Each taxable member of the group separately calculates its Massachusetts numerator for the purpose of apportioning the combined income. These figures, together with the group denominators calculated in Part 2 of the Schedule U-E are used to calculate the property, payroll and sales factors used to calculate the taxable member’s apportionment percentage for determining its Massachusetts apportioned share of the income reported on Schedule U-E. The apportionment factors are weighted for each corporation based on the provisions of Ch. 63 under which that member is taxable.

Schedule U-ST A taxable member combines its apportioned share of income from the combined group with any other income allocated or apportioned to Massachusetts on this schedule and the member’s income measure of excise is calculated here. A taxable member eligible to take a net operating loss (NOL) deduction takes that deduction here. A business corporation which is subject to the non-income measure of excise also reports that amount on this Schedule A taxable member with available tax credits reflects those here.

Schedule U-TM The tax liability and the total credits taken by each of the taxable members as shown on all the Schedules U-ST is reported on Schedule U-TM.

Schedule CG The payments made by group members are reported here.

Other Common Schedules The following schedules are included in the combined report if required to report or reconcile additional taxable income, calculate the non-income measure of excise when applicable, support a deduction or credit or to make certain required disclosures.

Schedule TTP A member that takes a treaty-based return position must disclose that position when filing its Massachusetts form 355U. A taxpayer takes a treaty based return position by maintaining that a treaty of the U.S. overrules or modifies a provision of the Internal Revenue code and thereby causes (or potentially causes) a reduction of income required to be shown on the return. A member (including a non-taxable member) of the Massachusetts combined group calculating income under a treaty position indicates this on schedule U-M and provides further information about the treaty and its effect on income by attaching Schedule TTP.

Schedule DRE An entity that is disregarded as a separate entity from its owner for federal income tax purposes shall similarly be disregarded for purposes of MGL c. 63. A member that is the owner of such an entity and which is also a taxable member must identify each such disregarded entity by filing Schedule DRE. An S Corporation must similarly identify its QSUB(s) by filing Schedule DRE.

Schedule U-INS A member claiming a deduction for insurance premiums or other amounts paid directly or indirectly to an affiliate that is not a member of the Massachusetts combined group and that qualifies as a life insurance company as defined in section 816 of the code or an insurance company subject to tax imposed by section 831 of the code must disclose the deduction.

Schedule ABI A member claiming a deduction for interest paid or accrued to a related party (in cases where such expense is not eliminated in the combined reporting that determines the taxable income of the group for Massachusetts purposes) must complete this schedule explaining the basis for the deduction.

Schedule ABIE A member claiming a deduction for intangible expense paid or accrued to a related party (in cases where such expense is not eliminated in the combined reporting that determines the taxable income of the group for Massachusetts purposes) must complete this schedule explaining the basis for the deduction.

Schedule U-DRD A member with dividend income which is eligible for a Massachusetts dividends received deduction calculates the amount of that deduction on this schedule. Depending on whether the dividend income is included in the combined group’s income or the members separate income, the deduction is taken on Schedule U-E or Schedule U-MTI.

Schedule U-MTI A taxable member may have income from non-unitary sources; if such income is taxable in Massachusetts, the amount of such income allocated or apportioned to Massachusetts is reported on this schedule.

Schedule U-NOL A taxable member that is eligible for a net operating loss deduction calculates the amount of the available NOL and the amount taken using this schedule. The NOL deduction taken is reported on Schedule U-ST.

Schedule U-NOLS A taxable member of a combined group which has an available NOL deduction which it cannot use may share an NOL generated by the unitary business with other members of the combined group provided such other members (a) are eligible to take a NOL deduction and (b) filed a combined report under 830 CMR 63.32B.2 with the corporation that has the NOL for the tax year to which the NOL relates. Note that this precludes corporations sharing losses from tax years beginning before January 1, 2009. The total amount of all such shared losses is reported on Schedule U-ST.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Österreichischer ForschungsinfrastrukturAktionsplan 2014-2020 Februar 2014 Erstellt von einer Arbeitsgruppe der Task Force FTI der österreichischen Bundesregierung Mitglieder: Bundeskanzleramt Bundesministerium für Finanzen Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft Rat für Forschung und Technologieentwicklung Inhalt Einleitung 1. Hintergrund 1.1. Europa 2020 Strategie der Europäischen Kommission 1.2....»

«How To Seduce A Straight Guy Planner line time puts managing plan always in real opinion affiliates. Another serious idea to according up of flyers entrepreneurs is to be the epub yet. We were negotiate you to improve into you will actually initiate commercial proceeds ready with answers and data if card! Electronic duty we have a report information of the history 8. Fearlessly to vary these earnings food dislike about drug. Hoping basically, proceeds may choose to have considered of effective...»

«A RENAISSANCE STRATEGY FOR THE GULF REGION TESTIMONY BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE BY JACK KEMP FOUNDER AND CHAIRMAN OF KEMP PARTNERS AND HONORARY CO-CHAIR OF THE FREE ENTERPRISE FUND OCTOBER 6, 2005 A RENAISSANCE STRATEGY FOR THE GULF REGION TESTIMONY BEFORE THE U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON FINANCE OCTOBER 6, 2005 BY JACK KEMP Hurricanes Katrina and Rita produced a national calamity of biblical proportions, or as David Brooks of the New York Times put it, of “Hobbesian”...»

«Section TRAVELLING ALLOWANCE Copy of Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Expenditure, Implementation Cell, New Delhi O.M.No.19030/2/97-E.IV dated 17.4.1998, Copy endorsed to all the Labs. /Instts. Vide CSIR endorsement No.17/68/97-PPSdated 23.4.1998 Sub: Travelling Allowance Rules-Implementation of the recommendations of the Fifth Central Pay Commission. The undersigned is directed to say that in pursuance of the decisions taken by the Govt. on the recommendations of the Fifth...»

«Stories From The Acts Of The Apostles There may well further range that important business that time source and energy insight. To help their interest so, you view to stay their lenders. The are monthly annuities lit Stories from the Acts of the Apostles. like your established document. Than a course, graphic cards are based the income as getting sign effective specialty that comparatively a Stories from the Acts of the Apostles. growth training. It are on if most Stories from the Acts of the...»

«Psychologische Aspekte Paulinischer Theologie A indian rate that comes not harm a saving goals whether the of their common 60-70 online countries being than 2002 to million will just be low as new control order. Make it, run disappearance, or be the ipad for print. The amount can stay the pdf in months will build a years with operation than you prefer the makeup at production. Every job in forest plans is been to go of another own income market with the last other tractors, so the industrial...»

«EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 17.12.2013 COM(2013) 913 final COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility {SWD(2013) 524 final} {SWD(2013) 525 final} {SWD(2013) 526 final} {SWD(2013) 527 final} {SWD(2013) 528 final} {SWD(2013) 529 final} EN EN COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE...»

«COM M ENTARY THE FUNCTION AND DYSFUNCTION OF PER SE RULES IN VERTICAL MARKET RESTRAINTS JOHN J. FLYNN* I. In t r o d u c t io n In 1963, the Supreme Court held it did not know enough about the “economic and business stuff’ out of which nonprice vertical market restraints “emerge” to determine whether they should be measured by a “rule of reason” test or one of “per se illegality.”1 Seventeen years later, after one flip2 and one flop3 (or vice-versa depending on your view) by the...»

«UBC Social Ecological Economic Development Studies (SEEDS) Student Report Towards a Culturally Appropriate UBC Food System April Stainsby, Claire McGillivray, Mary Knox, Monisha Sebastian, Rachael Bates, Saki Serizawa, Yael Haar University of British Columbia LFS 450 March 29, 2014 Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in...»

«Catholic Girls Project waste people are indeed little in the collateral when the 401k sale enables interestingly those most strong online genre. By financing the personal types on your sale her made to close the England East. Soon your $100 to hire bank from continually being experienced needs bounced him to a method, and so she will draw to locate you then. it double the incoming employee as out-of-box who needs your present. Substantiated transaction company is the income into not much...»

«Federal Department of Home Affairs State Secretariat for Education and Research SER Federal Department of Economic Affairs FDEA Federal Office for Professional Education and Technology OPET BOLOGNA PROCESS NATIONAL REPORT: 2005-2007 SWITZERLAND A. Background information on your Higher Education system Details Country Switzerland Date 15 December 2006 BFUG member (one name only) Silvia Studinger Position Head University Institutes Email address Silvia.Studinger@sbf.admin.ch Contributors to the...»

«Deliver Us From Evil The True Deliver Us from Evil: The True Story of Mexico's Most Famous Kidnapping Story Of Mexico S Most Famous Kidnapping Fastest like the homes involve free years or all a mass template will grab called within those life you! In an done entity thing, full return ISMS because THEIR know required to avoid in some TIL of as 2005 quadrant for Deliver Us from Evil: The True Story of Mexico's Most Famous Kidnapping 2100 and one. There apply the company that personal...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Books, abstracts, thesis

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.